Rose-breasted Grosbeak Pheucticus ludovicianus Scientific name definitions

Valerie E. Wyatt and Charles M. Francis
Version: 1.0 — Published March 4, 2020
Text last updated January 1, 2002

Originally Appeared in

Breeding

Phenology

Testicular Cycle

Unlike other migrant passerines (70 species examined), sperm emissions in Rose-breasted Grosbeaks observed during spring migration, when birds are far south of their breeding range (Quay 1985a). Sperm release also observed in males newly arrived on breeding grounds; these males usually closely attended by a female; first inseminations of females in Missouri were clustered during the period 4–9 May (Quay 1989b).

Pair Formation

Timing of pair formation unknown; some pairing may occur prior to arrival at nesting territory (Dunham 1966c, Quay 1989b). Males arrive first, separately over several days or at once in groups, females a few days later (Dunham 1966c, Francis and Cooke 1990). Earliest males apparently stay to breed, migrants move through for several weeks after (Dunham 1966c). See Migration: timing and routes, above, for arrival dates.

Nest-Building

In Tennessee, commences in second week of May (Nicholson 1997o) and in Ohio, second half of May (Peterjohn and Rice 1991). In northerly parts of the range, nests may not be initiated until late May (Ontario) or Jun (Saskatchewan; Macoun and Macoun 1909, VEW). Con-struction takes 2–5 d.

First/Later Broods Per Season

See Figure 4 . Throughout range, laying from mid-May through Jul. Range of first egg dates in New York, 18 May–5 Jun (Watts 1935); s. New England, 23 May–15 Jun (Forbush 1929); Ontario, 10 May–16 Jul (Peck and James 1987); Saskatchewan, 21 Jun (Macoun and Macoun 1909). Egg dates in Quebec mid-May to mid-Jul (Pelletier and Dauphin 1996), in Maritime Provinces of Canada, early Jun to mid-Jul (Erskine 1992a). Single peak in laying dates; in Ontario, 40% of egg dates were in period 30 May–10 Jun (n = 250; Peck and James 1987); 32% of egg dates in 1996–1998 were in period 30 May–1 Jun (n = 62; CWS unpubl.).

Second Brood Per Season

Pairs generally single-brooded (Watts 1935, Bent 1968b), although second broods suspected to occur infrequently in Ontario (Langley 1976, Peck and James 1998); confirmed in semicaptivity (Ivor 1944). One instance in Emmet Co., MI, of extreme overlap in first and second nestings, in which second clutch was initiated when young of first brood were 2–6 d old (Rothstein 1973a).

Nest Site

Selection Process

Little information. Male may help select nest site. Roberts (Roberts 1932c) reported observations of both male and female settling into an appropriate fork and turning around several times, as if to test suitability.

Microhabitat

In Ontario, nest sites typically located in forest openings characterized by relatively more open canopy and subcanopy than randomly selected sites (VEW). Nest-site selection not related to number or size of trees, shrub cover, sapling cover, or ground cover within a 5-m radius (VEW). Information needed on microhabitat within range outside Ontario.

Site Characteristics

Nests located in a wide variety of habitats, including deciduous, mixed, and coniferous woodlands, overgrown fields and pastures, shrubby road and rail rights-of-way, in gardens, parks, residential areas.

From Peck and James 1987 and VEW, Ontario. Nests placed in various trees, shrubs, and vines, more often in vertical forks or crotches than on horizontal limbs. Saplings more often selected than tall trees. Deciduous saplings, shrubs, and vines (87% [Peck and James 1987], 76% [VEW]) preferred over coniferous species. Plant species most commonly selected include maple (Acer) sp. and red-berried elder (Sambucus pubens). Coniferous species include balsam fir (Abies balsamea), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), and spruce (Picea spp.). Nests located in both wet areas (swamps, bogs, swales, moist woods) and dry upland areas. One nest reported on rocky outcropping.

Nest heights ranged from 0.8 to 16.8 m (n = 357), averaged 6 m (n = 50; Scott 1998b). Information needed on nest-site characteristics within range outside Ontario.

Nest

Construction Process

Quay (Quay 1989b) estimated that selection and establishment of a territory and nest-building take 4–9 d. Watts (Watts 1935) concluded that nest-building lasts an average of 5 d and is conducted from dawn until dusk. A semicaptive Rose-breasted Grosbeak completed nest-building in approximately 2 d, and first egg laid the day before nest completion (Ivor 1944). Female generally locates appropriate twigs; both male and female construct.

Structure And Composition Matter

Nest is a loose, open cup constructed of coarse sticks, twigs, coarse grasses, weed stems, decayed leaves or straw lined with fine twigs, rootlets, or hair (Baicich and Harrison 1997). No cementing agent used. In Ontario, nest exteriors usually twigs, less often plant stalks, fibers, coarse grasses, pine needles, bark strips, vine tendrils, and flower heads; linings usually fine grasses and rootlets, sometimes fine twigs, plant stalks and fibers, pine needles, leaf and fruit stems, leaves, bark shreds, and feathers (Peck and James 1987). Often nests are so thinly constructed that eggs can be seen from below through nest (Peck and James 1987). Although nest appears flimsy, incorporation of forked twigs such as Geum canadense may result in added strength without additional bulk (Wyatt 1997).

Dimensions

In Ontario, 8 nests measured 9–20 cm in diameter, 7–15 cm inside diameter, 4–12 cm outside depth and 3–9 cm inside depth (Peck and James Peck and James 1987, Peck and James 1998). From collections of Western Foundation for Vertebrate Zoology (WFVZ), outside diameter and depth of 1 Kansas nest: 13 × 7.5 cm; inside diameter and depth: 8 × 4 cm. Outside diameter and depth of 4 New York and Maryland nests 10–15 × 5–9.5 cm; inside diameter and depth: 6–8 × 4–4.5 cm.

Microclimate

No information.

Maintenance Or Reuse Of Nests, Alternate Nests

New nest is built for each nesting attempt. One report exists of a nest reused in 2 successive years without apparent maintenance or renovation (Friesen et al. 1999b).

Nonbreeding Nests

None recorded.

Eggs

Shape

Subelliptical to short subelliptical (Baicich and Harrison 1997).

Size

Length and breadth of 50 eggs averaged 24.6 × 17.7 mm; extremes 26.7 × 18.6, 25.7 × 19.1, 20.3 × 17.6, 23.4 × 16.3 mm (Bent 1968b). From collections of WFVZ, length 24.3 mm (range 22.32–27.17), breadth 17.6 mm (range 16.3–18.8 [n = 85]; R. Corado pers. comm.).

Mass

From collections of WFVZ, mass of empty shell 0.215 g (range 0.161–0.259 [n = 85]; R. Corado pers. comm.). No information on mass of intact eggs.

Color

Pale green, blue, or bluish green, blotched and speckled with reddish brown or purplish red. Markings sparse at narrow end, increasing in density toward larger end (Ehrlich et al. 1988, Baicich and Harrison 1997).

Surface Texture

Smooth, slightly glossy (Baicich and Harrison 1997).

Eggshell Thickness

No information.

Clutch Size

In Ontario, clutches of 226 nests ranged from 1 to 5 eggs, mode 4 (41%; Peck and James 1987). Average clutch size of 11 nests in Iowa 3.27 (Best and Stauffer 1980). Across breeding range, clutches of 151 nests ranged from 3 to 5, mode 4 (67%; WFVZ, R. Corado pers. comm.).

Egg-Laying

Little information on timing of initiation (see Nest, above). Eggs laid on consecutive days, at intervals of approximately 24 h, at least 1 h and as much as 3 h after sunrise (Scott 1998b).

Incubation

Onset Of Broodiness And Incubation In Relation To Laying

Incubation usually begins when penultimate egg is laid (Scott 1998b).

Incubation Patch

Female has single ventral brood patch. A partial brood patch develops in some males (Pyle 1997c).

Incubation Period

Twelve to 13 d (Ivor 1944); 12 d (Scott 1998b); 11–14 d (Peck and James 1998). Eggs in clutch hatch asynchronously, up to 48 h apart (Scott 1998b).

Parental Behavior

During the day, male does approximately one-third of incubation, female the remainder (Watts 1935). At night, female typically incubates. Eggs rarely left unattended. Both sexes approach incubating partner and sing softly to exchange places (Ivor 1944, VEW). Male frequently sings while on or near nest. Incubating males responded to taped playbacks but would not leave nest until replaced by mate (Kroodsma 1974c).

Hardiness Of Eggs Against Temperature Stress/Effect Of Egg Neglect

No information.

Hatching

No information.

Young Birds

Condition At Hatching

Altricial, eyes closed, sparse white down on capital, dorsal, crural, femoral, and alular tracts. Average body mass 4.5 g, length 5 cm (Watts 1935).

Growth And Development

In New York State, on days 2–6 after hatching, young gained at least 3 g/d; average mass on day 7 was 24.9 g, day 8, 26 g, day 9 (usually day before fledging), 27.5 g, length 10 cm (Watts 1935). Quills appear on day 5; nearly fully feathered by day 12 (Bent 1968b). Sexes can be distinguished at age of 5 d; young male has pink wing-linings. Call note made by young 6 d after hatching; young follow visual stimuli with eyes at 7 d (Dunham Dunham 1966a, Dunham 1966c). Freeze response to threatening stimuli first observed 7, 8, or 9 d after hatching (Ivor 1944, Dunham 1965). Egg tooth disappears 13 d after hatching (Ivor 1944).

Parental Care

Brooding

During the day, brooding shared about equally between male and female (Watts 1935). Brooding for periods ranging from 1 h 19 min to 6 h 54 min (Bent 1968b). No data on brooding changes throughout nestling period.

Feeding

Number of feeding visits at least 7/h (Watts 1935) to 10/h (Ivor 1944). Twenty-eight feeding visits by male in 30 min (Bent 1968b). In one full day of observation, 22–58 feeding visits/h by parents to nestlings of unknown age (E. H. Forbush in McAtee 1908a); frequency of feeding visits highest between 06:00 and 08:00 and after 16:00. In nearly 60 h of observation, 74% of feedings by female (Bent 1968b). Little information as to sex differences in feeding behavior. No information on changes in feeding rate with number or age of young.

Diet of nestlings approximately three-quarters animal matter (McAtee 1908a). Most common food item was insect larvae; seeds and other insects made up much smaller proportion of diet (Bent 1968b). Insects often crushed before being fed to nestlings (Dunham 1966a). See Food habits: diet, above, for food types.

Nest Sanitation

Parents eat feces of newly hatched young (Ivor 1944). Later, either parent carries away fecal sacs (Watts 1935).

Carrying Of Young

Not known to occur.

Cooperative Breeding

One instance of semicaptive male feeding another semicaptive pair's brood on several occasions when brood was neglected (Ivor 1944). No reported cooperative breeding for wild birds.

Brood Parasitism by Other Species

Frequency Of Occurrence, Seasonal Or Geographic Variation

Reported by Bent (Bent 1968b) and Ehrlich et al. (Ehrlich et al. 1988) to be a common Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) host, but quantitative data do not support these generic statements (see Table 2). No other nest parasites known. Studies in e. North America show relatively low rates of parasitism compared to other open-cup-nesting species. In Ontario, parasitism rates ranged from 3.6 to 10%. In Quebec, 7.1% of 42 nests parasitized (Terrill 1961). Rates of 5% in New York (n = 20; Link and Hahn 1996), 0% in Illinois (n = 3; Robinson 1992) and Iowa (n = 18; Best and Stauffer 1980). Cowbird eggs or young in 23% of 70 nests of Rose-breasted, Black-headed, and hybrid grosbeak pairs in the Great Plains area of maximum hybridization (Anderson and Daugherty 1974).

Timing Of Laying In Relation To Host'S Laying

No information.

Response To Parasitic Mother, Eggs, Or Nestlings

No information. Aggressive behavior and nest-tending by both parents may result in less vulnerability to brood parasitism compared to other species (Friesen et al. 1999c).

Effects Of Parasitism On Host

Limited Ontario samples of successful, parasitized nests indicate number of Rose-breasted Grosbeak young fledged/successful nest unaffected by parasitism (Friesen et al. 1999c [n = 4], CWS unpubl. [n = 3]). Parasitism did not reduce ability of Rose-breasted Grosbeaks to fledge at least 1 host young (Burke and Nol 2000). In Illinois, no nests failed due to brood parasitism (n = 9; Best and Stauffer 1980).

Success Of Parasite With This Host

No Brown-headed Cowbirds fledged from a limited sample (n = 6) of parasitized nests in Ontario (CWS unpubl.).

Fledgling Stage

Departure From Nest, Growth

Nestlings leave nest as early as 9 d of age and as late as 12 d, generally at about 10 d (Scott 1998b, VEW).

Association With Parents Or Other Young

Young dependent on adults for about 3 wk after fledging. Maintain family groups throughout summer until migration (Watts 1935). Where infrequent second nesting is initiated, male feeds nestlings or fledged young while female renests (H. R. Ivor in Bent 1968b, Rothstein 1973a).

Ability To Get Around, Feed, And Care For Self

No information.

Immature Stage

No information.

Rose-breasted Grosbeak Figure 4. Annual cycle of breeding, migration, and molt of the Rose-breasted Grosbeak
Enlarge
Figure 4. Annual cycle of breeding, migration, and molt of the Rose-breasted Grosbeak

Annual cycle of breeding, migration, and molt of the Rose-breasted Grosbeak across the species’ range. Thick lines show peak activity; thin lines, off-peak.

Rose-breasted Grosbeak Adult male Rose-breasted Grosbeak, with nestlings
Enlarge
Adult male Rose-breasted Grosbeak, with nestlings
Rose-breasted Grosbeak Rose-breasted Grosbeak nest, Ontario
Enlarge
Rose-breasted Grosbeak nest, Ontario

Waterloo Co., Ontario.  4 June 1967.  Ruler is 8 cm.; photographer Rene Corado

Rose-breasted Grosbeak Rose-breasted Grosbeak clutch, NY State
Enlarge
Rose-breasted Grosbeak clutch, NY State

Potter Swamp, Yates Co., New York.  4 June.

Recommended Citation

Wyatt, V. E. and C. M. Francis (2020). Rose-breasted Grosbeak (Pheucticus ludovicianus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A. F. Poole and F. B. Gill, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.robgro.01
Birds of the World

Partnerships

A global alliance of nature organizations working to document the natural history of all bird species at an unprecedented scale.